0
Skip to Content
TVDM Consultants
Home
About Us
Legislation
Services
Blog
Newsletters
Interviews
Podcasts
Training
Webinars
Question and Answers
External blogs
IDR Workshop
About
Sign in
Contact Us
10 Minute Consult
TVDM Consultants
Home
About Us
Legislation
Services
Blog
Newsletters
Interviews
Podcasts
Training
Webinars
Question and Answers
External blogs
IDR Workshop
About
Sign in
Contact Us
10 Minute Consult
Home
About Us
Legislation
Services
Folder: Multimedia
Back
Blog
Newsletters
Interviews
Podcasts
Training
Webinars
Question and Answers
External blogs
IDR Workshop
Folder: Our Neighbourhood
Back
About
Sign in
Contact Us
10 Minute Consult

IDR Workshop Judgements (Arbitration section)

  1. Kotzen v Thorn Valley Estate, which confirms that the CSOS Act does not exclude the right of parties to refer a dispute to arbitration( in a homeowners association).

  2. Heathrow Property Holdings v Manhattan Place Body Corporate, which is the strong precedent by the Western Cape High Court that  the legislature intended that the primary forum for adjudication of disputes in terms of the Act is the CSOS and that the High Court is intended to be a which is to exercise review and appellate jurisdiction- not adjudicatory jurisdiction. The court in this matter was dealing with a sectional title scheme.

  3. Wingate Body Corporate v Pamba, which followed the  Heathrow Property Holdings matter.  This is a Gauteng High Court judgement thus following the Western Cape High Court judgement.

Contact us: 061 536 3138 | info@tvdmconsultants.com

Copyright © 2020 TVDM Consulting | Terms of use | Privacy Policy | All Rights Reserved